This week, you will learn how to plan care for patients while considering their diverse cultural backgrounds. This is an APA paper, which requires a title page, double spacing, and set up as per the example papers in your APA book. Please select a culture different from the one you chose to research in week 2.
Then, address the following:
Describe the key components of conducting a comprehensive cultural assessment (rationales, interventions and evaluations may be found on the internet).
Choose two of the components, reflect on your own culture and how it impacts your own attitude toward those aspects of providing culturally diverse care.
Imagine that you are working in a physician’s office. A patient of a background different from your own comes in to be seen for a newly diagnosed problem. Create two nursing diagnoses that reflect cultural diversity (look at Appendix A for guidance ie., “Barrier to communication”); then give rationale for each diagnosis and describe how you would intervene and evaluate for success of your plan of care.
Points: 40
References
Minimum of four (4) total references: two (2) references from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)
Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMed or CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice guidelines. Examples of unacceptable references are Wikipedia, UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases.
Style
Unless otherwise specified, all the written assignment must follow APA 6th edition formatting, citations and references. Click here to download the Microsoft Word APA 6th edition template. Make sure you cross-reference the APA 6th edition book as well before submitting the assignment.
E 4570 RUBRIC: M3 A6 WA: CULTURALLY APPROPRIATE CARE PLANNING(40 pts)Last updated: 06/07/2017© 2017School of Nursing -Ohio UniversityPage 1of 2CriteriaLevels of AchievementAccomplishedNeeds Improvement Not AcceptableIntroduction7 to 7 PointsClearly states the purpose of the paper.Provides a comprehensive overview of topic or questions.Engages the reader.Organized and has easy follow.2 to 6PointsOverview is provided, but key points/ideas are missing.Purpose statementis not clear.Does not engage the reader.Somewhat disorganized but still comprehensible0 to 1 PointsDoes not provide an overview of the paper or is absent.No purpose statement.BodyKey Requirement 17to 7PointsDescribe the key components of a comprehensive cultural assessmentEvidence of critical thinking3to 6PointsOne or two elements missing or are not fully describedLacking some evidence of critical thinking.0 to 2PointsMissing half of the elementsNot enough depth to demonstrate understanding of the components of a comprehensive cultural assessment.Key Requirement27to 7PointsChooses two components of the cultural assessment, reflect on one’s own culture in terms of those componentsDiscusses how one’s own culture potentially affects how one provides nursing care3to 6PointsChooses one component or ismissing at least one area discussed in the instructionsLacks critical thinking and depth.0 to 2PointsWriter does not fully discuss two components or consider his or her own cultureDoes not discuss how culture could affect care.KeyRequirement36to 6PointsCreatestwo nursing diagnoses that reflect cultural diversityGivesrationale for each diagnosis and describeshow you would intervene and evaluate for success of your plan of care.3to 5PointsCreatedtwo nursing diagnoses but did not give rational or intervention/evaluation of success.0 to 2PointsOnly one nursing diagnosis, or did not fully answer the assignment questions.Conclusion7 to 7 PointsSummarizes paper and reflects on what the reader has learned from the paper.Demonstrates persuasive thought and is well organized.2 to 6 PointsMerely summarizes the introduction or contains new ideas not present in the paper contents.Somewhat disorganized but still comprehensible0 to 1 PointsSimplyrestates the introduction or is absent.Disorganized to the point of distraction.
NRSE 4570 RUBRIC: M3 A6 WA: CULTURALLY APPROPRIATE CARE PLANNING(40 pts)Last updated: 06/07/2017© 2017School of Nursing -Ohio UniversityPage 2of 2CriteriaLevels of AchievementAccomplishedNeeds Improvement Not AcceptableStylistics6 to 6 PointsAPA Citations are appropriate.Formatted correctly.Reference page is complete and correctly formatted.At least 4 references provided: Two (2) references from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. *References not older than five years.More than 600 words excluding title and reference pages.3 to 5 PointsAPA Citations are appropriate and formatted correctly.Reference page is formatted correctly.References are not professional or is not formatted correctly.Missing 1 professional reference.At least 600 words or more excluding title and reference pages.0 to 2 PointsNo citations are used or citations are made but not formatted correctlyReference page is missing.Less than 600 words excluding title and reference pages.Peer-reviewed references include professional journals (i.e. Nursing Education Perspectives, Journal of Professional Nursing, etc.–), professional organizations (NLN, CDC, AACN, ADA, etc.) applicable to population and practice area, along with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs -National Guideline Clearinghouse).References not acceptable (not inclusive) are UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases.*All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)Note:You will have three (3) attemptsto submit a written assignment, only the final attempt will be graded. For each attempt you will receive a SafeAssign originality report.This will give you a chance to correct the assignment based on the SafeAssign score.Click hereto view instructions on how to interpret SafeAssign originality report.
Recent Comments