1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00%
|
3 Satisfactory 79.00%
|
4 Good 87.00%
|
5 Excellent 100.00%
|
70.0 %Content
|
|
40.0 %Chipotle Flowcharts and Commentary
|
Chipotle flowcharts are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
|
Chipotle flowcharts make weak connections with several gaps, and they are weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.
|
Chipotle flowcharts make connections at a cursory level and contain minimal gaps. Supporting sources show some understanding of the content.
|
Chipotle flowcharts make meaningful connections, contain no gaps, and are clear and integrated. Supporting sources illustrate an understanding of the content.
|
Chipotle flowcharts make meaningful connections, contain no gaps, and are thorough and well integrated. Supporting sources illustrate a deep understanding of the content.
|
30.0 %Restaurant Flowchart and Commentary
|
Restaurant flowchart and commentary are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
|
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make weak connections with several gaps, and they are weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.
|
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make connections at a cursory level and contain minimal gaps. Supporting sources show some understanding of the content.
|
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make meaningful connections, contain no gaps, and are clear and integrated. Supporting sources illustrate an understanding of the content.
|
Restaurant flowchart and commentary make meaningful connections, contain no gaps, and are thorough and well integrated. Supporting sources illustrate a deep understanding of the content.
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
|
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
|
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
|
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
|
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
|
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
10.0 %Documentation
|
|
10.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
Sources are not documented.
|
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
|
Recent Comments