There was once an outlaw named Fred who had robbed 24 banks successfully.

On the way to rob his 25th bank, Fred said to himself: “I have robbed 24 banks, and every single time, I got away unharmed with the money. Therefore, when I rob this bank today, I will get away unharmed with the money.”

But on this day, Fred was ambushed by many citizens and shot to death.

What Fred said to himself was an argument. Was that argument deductive or non-deductive?

If you said deductive, was it valid or invalid?

If you said non-deductive, was it strong or weak?

– Give reasons for both your answers.

To participate in this discussion board, you must respond with a substantial paragraph (at least 5 sentences) to the discussion question

In your reply post to another student, give reasons why you don’t agree with their answer(s), or give reasons why you do agree with their answer(s).

When you respond to a fellow student’s response, you need to dispute some point that another student made, and to give reasons for your response. Don’t just say something like “I disagree with his or her response.” Be respectful: the goal is to have an enlightening debate

The other students post is in the file to respond toPlease answer the questions above for the discussion question then respond to the other student from in the file upload