Generate two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of group decision making within the context of deciding how to spend revenue obtained from a new sales tax. Include at least two (2) examples of such advantages and disadvantages to support your position.

The advantages of group decision making are:

(i) There will be cooperative energy as the group will take decision in general. The decision making procedure will incorporate collaborations, brainstorming, and discourses (O’doherty 2017).

(ii) (ii) there will share of data and every part contribute novel data and skill.

The disadvantages are

(i) groupthink – in this the individuals may take irrational or not as much as optimal decision keeping in mind the end goal to keep up congruity in the group

(ii) (ii) lower efficiency – this is on the grounds that the group decision making process takes additional time.

(1) a case of the benefit of group decision making is – In numerous nations the whole service (finance service) is included through dialogs and civil argument, to choose how to spend the income. These outcomes in the group making a rational decision

(2) a case of disservice is that it requires a considerable measure of investment. Numerous nations invest impressive measure of energy and cash in setting up their financial plan as they take the conclusion and include a few partners in the decision making process.

Review the bases of social power, discussed in Chapter 9 of the textbook. Appraise two (2) types of power, and predict two (2) ways in which these powers are limited in public organizations and / or non-profit organizations. Provide support for your rationale.

Referent power is the capacity to motivate others to conform to your desires since you have individual appeal. The capacity to address the issues of another or control the other by remunerating the desired behavior. Pay, promotion, or rewards might be ways that associations apply compensate power over employees this power won’t go far, just in light of the fact that a great many people in the work compel have a limited ability to focus.

The charmistic way one handles him or herself will be short lived. In general society and private area individuals are worked to go to work put forth a valiant effort and go home to friends to family (Hofmann, D. C. 2017). The capacity to focus of an employee is centered on what the Job. In the event that an employee is an advantage for the association and goes well beyond for the job, one way an association can demonstrate thankfulness for that employee is to give the employee a reward. In the event that an employee feels increased in value, the employee will keep on going well beyond for the association.

References:

O’doherty, J. P., Cockburn, J., & Pauli, W. M. (2017). Learning, reward, and decision making. Annual review of psychology, 68, 73-100.

Hofmann, D. C. (2017). Charismatic Leadership. Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics, 1-4.